Right now, there are enormous almost messianic expectations surrounding 2027 in Human Design. Many people imagine this transition as some kind of collective awakening of humanity. as if THEN everything will be stable... right.... it is a trap! it's a lie! one big fat lie! ANY changes will bring enormous pain because any transformation will bring crisis... change does that to you... But people believ that the old systems will collapse and suddenly a world of free, conscious, autonomous individuals will emerge, living in love, sensitivity, and inner truth. right... 

But if you listen carefully to the mechanics Ra actually described, it becomes obvious: he never spoke about the future in such romantic terms. 2027 does not destroy groups. It changes the principle through which people bond with one another. And those are two very different things.

Because humanity will remain a collective species. Pentas are not disappearing. WA-fields are not disappearing. People will continue creating families, communities, alliances, digital tribes, ideological groups, spiritual circles, fractal connections, and temporary coalitions. But the nature of connection itself is beginning to radically change. It's like when I was born and raised in Sovier Union, but one day we woke up and USSR did not exist anymore... I didn't die, but our ways of living changed... radically changed! 

So... The old world was built upon tribal architecture. Upon belonging. Upon the idea of stability through the collective.  This is what the Cross of Planning was built on:

• duty
• family loyalty
• collective morality
• religious systems
• governmental structures
• the idea that “we must stay together”
• safety through belonging to a group

Everything I always questioned... 

This is why the twentieth century became the century of large institutions, large family systems, large religions, large governments, large collective narratives. But this structure is now beginning to collapse right before our eyes. And this is no longer theory! We are already living inside this process.

People no longer trust institutions. Families dissolve faster than they are created. Governments are losing the ability to maintain a unified perception of reality. Religions no longer hold a monopoly over consciousness. Social media fragments humanity into micro-tribes. Algorithms create separate informational universes in which every individual becomes convinced that their version of reality is the real one. 

And perhaps most importantly, humanity is gradually losing its shared language. Not language in the literal sense alone, but the shared perception of reality itself. There was a time when societies still existed inside relatively unified narratives. People disagreed, fought politically, argued morally, split ideologically, but they were still participating inside the same collective field of meaning... That tribal meaning was still uniting them - shared religion, shared political views, shared memories, duties.... They watched the same news, trusted the same institutions, referenced the same cultural symbols, and even conflict itself happened within a shared psychological structure.

Now that structure is dissolving. Two people can witness the exact same event and experience completely different realities. Not simply different opinion... different realities. Different emotional interpretations, different perceptions of danger, morality, identity, truth, and even humanity itself. Technology intensifies this fragmentation every single day. Algorithms no longer show humanity one world. They create millions of personalized psychological environments where each person lives inside a custom-built emotional reality shaped by fears, desires, outrage, trauma patterns, political identity, nervous system conditioning, and attention loops.

This is why communication itself feels increasingly difficult. People are no longer simply talking to each other. They are attempting to translate between entirely different perceptual worlds. And many conversations now feel emotionally exhausting because people are not arguing only through logic anymore. They are speaking from completely different frequency fields of perception.

The world is not moving toward unity. It is moving toward fragmentation. But this is where things become truly complicated, because the new forms of connection may become less stable, yet far more intense. And those who carry the 35–36 channel were almost designed for moments like this. Not because it feels easy for us. It does not. The Channel of Transitoriness carries mutation through emotional experience itself. It moves through instability, crisis, endings, emotional waves, uncertainty, transition, and pressure for change. People with this channel often feel life through movement before understanding it mentally. Through emotional impact before logic catches up. Which means periods of collective transition can feel strangely familiar to this circuitry. It will feel familiar, far less comfortable... In fact - opposite from any comfort you THINK you'd get in 2027. Because 35–36 was never built for static reality. It was built for crossing thresholds between realities. For moving through emotional chaos without completely collapsing inside it. And honestly... who promised this transition would feel easy? Why did YOU decide it would be easy? 

People will increasingly connect:

• Not through duty, but through resonance.
• Not through tradition, but through matching frequency.
• Not through collective obligation, but through temporary synchronization of perception, interests, emotional fields, mutations of consciousness, and shared worldviews.

This is exactly why many old relationships may suddenly feel strained right now. Maybe you noticed more arguments lately, frustration, more emotional misunderstandings that seem impossible to resolve logically. Maybe the old ways you used to connect with certain people simply stopped working already. Because many relationships were unconsciously held together by older collective structures: family roles, religious identity, social expectations, survival mechanisms, political loyalty, routines, or obligation itself. But resonance-based connection functions differently. You cannot force frequency alignment through duty forever. Some people now begin moving toward each other almost magnetically, as if something inside instantly recognizes the other person. And others slowly lose the ability to truly hear one another at all. It is not because one side is evil and the other awakened, it is because their inner realities are no longer synchronized.

And perhaps this is one of the hardest truths about the coming era: the collapse of shared language does not only happen globally. It happens inside friendships, inside marriages., inside families, inside spiritual communities... Because as collective structures weaken, people are forced to encounter something many spent their entire lives avoiding: their actual inner frequency. 

The other day I read a blog post written by a woman who publicly abandoned her dying mother. She wrote that she had failed to love her demanding mother and realized it was never truly her role as a daughter to provide the kind of unconditional love only a mother is supposed to give. And honestly, whether people agree with her or not, I think this touches something much deeper that humanity is beginning to confront right now.

The old ideas about parents are collapsing too. For generations, many cultures operated through invisible contracts that children never consciously agreed to. Parents gave life, and in return children were expected to provide emotional loyalty, caretaking, psychological meaning, material support, and protection from loneliness in old age. Entire family systems were built on obligation disguised as morality. Love often became entangled with guilt, duty, survival, sacrifice, and unconscious emotional dependency. And respect was spiced up with threat... 

But more and more people are beginning to question these inherited structures. Because giving birth to a child does not automatically create ownership over another human soul. Yes, our parents gave us life. That is true. But children are not obligated to become emotional retirement systems for their parents. They are not born to carry unresolved loneliness, provide permanent emotional regulation, fulfill unprocessed dreams, or become extensions of parental identity simply because they came through someone’s body. 

And I say this as a parent myself.

I do not see my children as beings who owe me love because I gave birth to them. I do not believe love becomes real through biological entitlement. My children are independent human beings with their own consciousness, destiny, emotional reality, and future. They do not “belong” to me psychologically simply because I carried them in my womb and pushed them through my vagina. I will die for them as a mother, if I need to. Because to them - I am BIG, and they are small... 

What matters to me is not forced loyalty. What matters is whether, as human beings, we remain capable of genuine connection. Because there is a profound difference between love that grows naturally and attachment enforced through guilt, obligation, fear, or social conditioning. And that conditioning I cracked open in me in winter time... And I think many old family structures are now entering crisis precisely because humanity is beginning to separate these two things for the first time.

Some people experience this shift as liberation. Others experience it as betrayal. Because once collective obligation weakens, relationships can no longer survive purely through inherited roles. “Mother.” “Father.” “Daughter.” “Son.” "Spouse" etc. Those labels alone are no longer enough to sustain emotional connection if there is no actual resonance, respect, emotional safety, or authenticity underneath them. 

And this may become one of the most uncomfortable transitions of the coming era: people increasingly wanting relationships that are consciously chosen, not mechanically inherited.

Which is exactly why the world after 2027 may not become calmer at all, but more turbulent. When a single program disappears, countless competing realities emerge.

And we are already witnessing this:
— digital cults
— identity wars
— radical ideologies
— information warfare
— virtual tribes
— emotional polarization
— the collapse of shared truth

The paradox is that technology simultaneously connects humanity while tearing it apart. The internet was supposed to unite the world. Instead, it created millions of isolated bubbles of consciousness.  Each person now lives inside their own algorithmic reality! I have thousands "friends", but I rarely see their posts... In fact, algorythms show me random people I don't even know, BUT... algorythm knows WHAT I am interested in... Fascinating! And this reflects the mechanics of the end of the Cross of Planning with astonishing precision. 

The collective “we” can no longer sustain the pressure it once carried. But this does not mean the end of groups. It means the end of unconscious dissolution within them. And this is where the true challenge of the new era begins:

Will a human being be able to enter groups without losing themselves inside them?

Because in the past, people often did not separate themselves from the field of the collective at all. They lived through family programming as though it were their own personality. Through religious programming as though it were their own truth. Through national identity as though it were their own soul.

The Penta mechanically swallowed the individual whole. And many people never even realized where they ended... and where the collective field began... But now differentiation is becoming a matter of psychological and even spiritual survival.

This is why Ra constantly returned people to Strategy and Authority. This is not a “spiritual practice.” THIS IS YOUR internal navigation system. It will help you during this crisis.. Because without an inner compass, a person in the future risks dissolving completely inside the chaos of collective fields, opinions, algorithms, emotional waves, and mass programming. And here we arrive at a deeply uncomfortable truth many people do not want to hear: individuality does not automatically make a person mature.

Individuality is not the same as wisdom.

It can be:
— genius
— creative
— mutative
— destructive
— chaotic
— antisocial
— insane

Mutation does not come to make the world more comfortable. And those desperately trying to preserve their “uncomfortable comfort”: the familiar pain, the familiar lies, the familiar half-lived life they already know how to survive inside... may want to stock up on more bandages. Because mutation does not negotiate with stagnation very gently. Its purpose is to alter the direction of evolution itself. 

And evolution has very little interest in protecting the structures people use to avoid truth. Especially the emotional structures built around safety, compromise, performance, social expectation, or fear of disrupting an old life that no longer feels alive. The problem is that many people still mistake emotional numbness for stability. They call survival “peace.” They call suppression “maturity.” They call emotional starvation “being responsible.” But mutation eventually enters the system anyway.

And once it does, the old reality may continue existing externally for some time, but internally the person already knows. Something HAS changed FOREVER... Something is no longer fully believable. The old emotional agreements stop holding the same psychological weight. And this is exactly where many people begin trying to hold on even tighter to the very structures already collapsing underneath them. Which usually only makes the eventual rupture more painful.

This is precisely why the Individual Circuit in Human Design always carries a conflictive nature. Every mutation destabilizes the system. And the collective almost always fears whatever disrupts stability.

So conflict is not disappearing, only its form is changing.

If humanity once fought through centralized ideologies and massive structures, the future may bring countless localized realities competing with one another for attention, influence, resources, and the authority to define “what truth is.” And perhaps the most important ability of the new era will be learning not to dissolve completely into any system: political, spiritual, digital, ideological, even one’s own group of like-minded people.

Because 2027 is not the end of collectives.

It is the end of the dream that the collective can save a person from the necessity of becoming themselves.  And perhaps this is exactly why so many people today feel both fear and a strange internal separation from the old world at the same time.

Especially individualists. Because the Individual Circuit tends to sense mutation earlier than others. Often as loneliness. As the feeling of “I cannot fully fit in.” As an inner split between oneself and collective normality. But in the new era, this may stop being seen as a defect and become a necessity. Because the ability to hear one’s own inner signal amidst the noise of collective fields is gradually becoming more than a personal trait.

It is becoming a form of consciousness survival. And I have been living this "inner signal" for quite some time...