After I wrote part I, I heard a man say something women have been trying to communicate for centuries, and I immediately understood why he said it so directly. He was not trying to be polite. He was trying to get through. He knew that some men would dismiss the same words from a woman as neediness, arrogance, anger, manipulation, or feminism... yes, that favorite word among men who need a label for every woman they cannot keep convenient. They needed to hear these words in a man’s voice, spoken without apology.

And the more fully I inhabit my own truth, the more men like this I meet on my path. They are not weak! They emanate immense power! They are not groveling at a woman’s feet, begging for female attention, permission, or approval. They are sovereign men, masters of their own ground, who understand the architecture of this world... They understand the opposites in the most sacred way of creation! They fucking know what they carry, who they are, and who stands before them! Their reverence is not a plea for validation... or a permission for existence... It is the recognition of one power by another. A man who is secure in his own nature has no need to diminish the feminine in order to feel large. He can bow without becoming small. He can serve without becoming servile or a slave. He can worship without surrendering his sovereignty. Only a man who has not yet met himself mistakes reverence for submission.

This is his message in full, in English:

“The central question here is: why do you receive this through a woman, through worship of her, instead of going directly to God? There is no other way. Only a man’s true partner can bring him to the Creator. That alone could have answered the question, but there is much more to say. The very essence of a woman’s birth is to unite with her true partner and, through HER heart, help HIM come to the Creator and merge with Him. The very essence of a man’s birth into this material world is to serve, honor, and worship his woman. And only when true partners unite, when a Divine Union is formed, does union with the Creator become possible. Without your true partner beside you, it remains technically impossible.  This is what everything ultimately comes down to. This is the truth about the way this world is built. It is like one and zero, Alpha and Omega, yin and yang, black and white. It is the basic, fundamental architecture of reality. You cannot merge with your Creator without it. Absolutely not. There are no exceptions. You cannot merge with your Creator until you have CHOSEN to allow your true partner to enter your life.  That is why all these forms of asceticism, all these stories in which a man spends his entire life alone without a woman, or a woman rejects relationships altogether, are complete heresy. NATURE and the laws of it contradicts this concept. A human being cannot become fully realized in this life without a true partner. 

For a man, connection with the Divine happens only through his true partner. Through her, he begins to hear that voice clearly and unmistakably. A woman is a portal to the Divine. That is why every woman is a goddess, a true Creator - bringing ideas into material world. Whether every man is a god remains to be seen, but every woman is unquestionably a goddess. Let us put it this way: the man is human... the woman is a Creator, a goddess, and she stands above him.  She can create life out of her own body. Then there is the ultimate Creator, who stands above them all. That is the correct hierarchy! I want to repeat this once more: a man is merely a function of woman. He is a function of the goddess.

The world does not revolve around a man or around his penis, I will tell you a secret. A man is not the main character here. In this game, in this civilization, on this Earth, he is not the central figure. Not even close. A man is absolutely empty, and without his true partner he is incapable of bringing into this world anything that truly belongs to his calling and purpose.

— @amazochi, translated 

Of course the language is provocative. It is meant to be. An enormous illusion is rarely broken by whispering around its edges. For generations, men have been taught to experience themselves as the central subject of life and women as supporting characters in the male journey: the wife who maintains his home, the mother who absorbs his pain, the lover who awakens his body, the muse who inspires his work, the assistant who protects his time, the emotional interpreter who helps him understand himself. Even when a woman is called a goddess, the title can become another decorative role designed to serve the man standing at the center.

This speaker destroys that geometry. He tells the man that he is not the sun around which the feminine must orbit. His achievements, status, intellect, spiritual practices, sexual power, and carefully defended independence do not make him the axis of creation. Something essential in him remains inaccessible until he learns to meet the feminine with reverence. This is why the statement sounds so offensive to the structure it is confronting. It does not offer the man a woman as another resource for his self-development. It asks him to recognize that the woman before him may be carrying a doorway he cannot force open through discipline, knowledge, money, or control. He must become capable of approaching that doorway differently.

Woman as a portal

Calling a woman a portal to the Divine does not mean assigning her another form of unpaid labor. She is not responsible for raising a grown man, regulating his emotions, healing his childhood, translating every silence, or delivering God into his hands. A portal is not a servant. A portal is a threshold. Standing before it requires presence, humility, and the willingness to leave behind the identity that can no longer pass through. It is called growing up next to a woman. 

Through genuine intimacy with the feminine, a man may encounter what his usual strategies cannot conquer: vulnerability, mystery, embodiment, surrender, relational truth, and a form of love that exposes every place where he has mistaken control for strength, secrecy for privacy, humility for humiliation, reverence for submission, and emotional distance for sovereignty. A true partner does not hand him the Divine as a reward for choosing her. Her presence creates a field in which he can finally hear what achievement and isolation allowed him to avoid. She may open the door. He must still walk through it. 

The words serve, honor, and worship will disturb many men because they have been trained to associate reverence with humiliation. Yet men worship constantly. They worship status, work, power, freedom, money, youth, public recognition, sexual access, and the right to remain unaccountable. They sacrifice their bodies, families, integrity, and years of their lives on those altars without ever calling it worship. To revere a woman does not require a man to erase himself! LOL It asks him to recognize the sacred where he has been trained to see availability. It asks him to protect what he once expected to consume, to listen where he once explained, and to become truthful where he once relied on charm, authority, silence, or avoidance. A man does not become smaller by kneeling before what is sacred. The false king becomes smaller. The man becomes visible.

Why another man had to say it

Women have named these truths repeatedly. They have described the loneliness of being used as inspiration without being honored as a source. They have watched men awaken through their love, language, sexuality, emotional labor, and spiritual vision, then carry the gifts elsewhere while quietly erasing the woman through whom those gifts arrived.

Again and again, the world celebrates what came through the door while resenting the hand that opened it. When a woman names this dynamic, she risks being called demanding, bitter, self-important, unsafe or desperate for recognition. When a man names it, other men are more likely to pause. He is speaking from inside the structure. He knows the defenses because he has inherited them too. His voice reaches a room from which women have often been excluded, even while their energy, wisdom, and bodies were being discussed inside it.

This is why men must sometimes confront other men. Women cannot remain responsible for translating their humanity into language that the male ego finds sufficiently gentle. At some point, a man must turn toward another man and say: the world does not revolve around you or your penis. The woman beside you is not an accessory to your purpose. If something sacred entered your life through her, your task is to honor the source rather than simply enjoy what you received. 

Reverence must have consequences

There is also a dangerous way to romanticize the idea of woman as a portal. A man can call a woman his goddess while continuing to treat her as a hidden source of emotional, sexual, or spiritual nourishment. He can praise her power in private while maintaining a public life that denies her place in his transformation. He can tell her that she awakened him, inspired him, saved him, or brought him closer to God, and still refuse every decision that would require him to embody what he claims to have learned. That is not worship. It is spiritual extraction. You cannot receive an awakening through a woman, appropriate everything she opened in you, and then return unchanged to the same throne from which you once consumed her. You cannot call her a portal while refusing to cross the threshold. You cannot call her a goddess while asking her to remain invisible, convenient, patient, and grateful for fragments of your presence. Reverence has consequences. Love has a body. Truth rearranges a life. If the encounter was real, it eventually asks for action: honest conversations, visible choices, surrendered defenses, changed priorities, clear boundaries, endings that have already happened internally, and beginnings that can no longer be postponed. A man does not honor the feminine by speaking beautifully about what she awakened. He honors her by becoming the man that awakening asked him to become.

The true partner

A true partner is not automatically the person with the official title, the longest history, or the most socially convenient position. Nor is this person simply the one who creates the strongest passion. they are the person before whom the false life becomes increasingly difficult to maintain. Her presence calls the man toward greater integrity, and his response reveals whether he desires transformation or merely the sensation of being transformed. Two different things with two different results! 

The language of “true partners” can easily become another fantasy if it is separated from sovereignty. A woman is not here to drag a man toward God while he resists every step. She cannot keep proving the path, explaining his heart, carrying his courage, or waiting beside a door he refuses to open. A Divine Union requires two people who can stand on their own ground and still choose to create something larger together. Larger than they are... Maybe the deeper meaning of the man’s message is this: there are dimensions of the soul that cannot be reached through solitary mastery. We may meditate, study, fast, travel, collect initiations, and speak beautifully about consciousness. Relationship reveals what private spirituality can conceal... It shows whether our wisdom can survive intimacy, whether our truth can become action, and whether our idea of love extends beyond receiving. I heard once that true meditation happens in quiet and solitude... and I smiled... That is a very beautiful concept. No wonder they say that a true meditation happens in the middle of the battlefield. You wonder why? 

The true partner does not complete an incomplete human being. She brings him to the precise threshold where all his unexamined incompleteness becomes visible. What happens next belongs to him.

Hear it from a man

I understand why this man spoke so sharply. The softness with which women have tried to explain their sacredness has too often been mistaken for permission to keep overlooking it. And I agree, a lot of women also misunderstand the concept! He was not asking men to hate themselves or surrender their humanity or their masculinity. on the contrary! He was stripping away the fantasy that masculinity becomes divine through dominance, independence, or being served. The world does not revolve around a man. A woman is not a supporting character in his spiritual biography. If he met the Divine through her heart, her body, her love, her truth, or the life she awakened in him, then gratitude cannot remain a private feeling. Honor must become visible. Maybe some men will only hear this when another man says it:

Stop consuming the feminine and begin revering it. Stop collecting revelations from women while building lives that deny the source of those revelations. Stop calling a woman your goddess when your choices require her to live like a secret, a servant, or a sacrifice.